Turns out no, Disney-Hyperion is a publishing arm that Disney used to own but was sold off and doesn't have anything to do with Disney as media company anymore.
Anyway, didn't think anything much of it until earlier today. I had just ended some conference calls for work and went into the kitchen to get some lunch. As I walked into the kitchen, I saw the book lying on the counter like this (yes, I took another picture...):
There is a heck a lot going on in this picture, and I kind of took it all in at once and conceded an additional point to the Fairies. So much so that I took the picture.
One of my complaints with some Fairy interactions, besides the increase of 'in your face' syncs that seemed to build over a short amount of time prior to my writing break on this blog, has been that it seems that it has almost tagged on with the story already in my head. In other words, I didn't come away with learning anything new. If it doesn't contribute to the story, or help build my understanding of it or move it along, then it kind of seems superfluous. I already know or think this, so why are you screaming it to me through syncs?
One could argue that perhaps a Fairy or two are wanting to use some of these symbols to reinforce and confirm some things. Basically, illustrate that my thinking is on the right track in some areas based on the stories I see in these breadcrumbs. They might even be saying also that they have had a hand in developing those thoughts in my mind over time - kind of like a signature. I think this is valid, and I don't want to discount this.
However, to me this is also potentially the most dangerous interpretation and should be treated with care. Because in this scenario, I think, lies the greatest risk of just reading your own junk into everything around you. If I am just seeing everything I already know or imagine in these things, then at some point you have to assume that there is a significant chance that this is just coming from my own imagination. You risk turning into the type of guy that does things like this, basically:
You have all these connections that you create across all sorts of random things that make sense to you, the crazy person, but rightfully should be discounted or ignored by others. The image above is from the movie A Beautiful Mind, which is based on the real-life story of John Nash and his battle with severe mental illness. Things that he was sure existed, were demonstratively and objectively false - they were not real. But he saw them anyway, and never stopped seeing them. I spent a couple years recently with quite a few people telling me that things I really felt were real were just in my mind. They might be right. I fortunately don't yet have imaginary people that I physically see but no one else can sitting next to me (like Nash did), but I do ascribe much of what goes on in my life and mind to the work of other Beings. I am not sure that is really very different in the end.
So, if only for my own benefit, tt needs to push the story forward. In other words, if you want to speak to me in whatever language that is how you communicate, then fine, but surprise me. Teach me something new. Make it more coherent and clear. Show me in some way that you are not just me. Otherwise, it's just chaos.
I was actually thinking of this a bit this morning in relation to the Fairies, and then entered "Schooled".
The title of the book itself is funny in the context I just laid out, right? Here I am complaining or wondering if the Fairies (at least some of them) don't have anything new to say, or aren't teaching me anything, and they almost speak to me through the title of this book - "Schooled... you've just been taught, sucker".
OK, so enough background, what do I see?
Well, I was first drawn to the name. The folded up corner made me look at the "Kor" (just the first part of the author's last name) and realize I have seen this word before. And I have, many times. It has a double meaning for me, or at least it has meant two different things to me, whether I am right or wrong about it. First, "Kor" is Elvish for round, and gives us additional variations that I have taken to mean ball or globe. So, in the first case, I have associated Stones with this name. But, second, that name is also applied to the Elvish city in Valinor that sat on a hill. In the earliest drafts, Kor was the name of both the city and the hill, and later Tuna was the proper name for the city, and Kor was the hill, I believe.
In any case, we have a potential double meaning here for Stone as well as the home of the Eldar in Valinor itself.
Then, looking at Gordon, I actually first thought of a song that my dad would play often when I was little and we would go on road trips. The song is called "Albany" and it was sung by a man named Roger Whittaker. Gordon is the name of one of the characters in that song, described as a 'golden eagle' who is ultimately betrayed by his brother who was "dark as a raven". It also describes a fortress named "Albany". This imaginary fortress resided in the Scottish Highlands, but was destroyed by the "King's Men" (setting it on fire) who desired Gordon's lands and his life. I have associated this song in the past with Eressea and it's partial destruction by Pharazon and his King's Men.
But for our purposes here, I wasn't focused on the song so much (although relevant, I think), but actually became more interested in the meaning of the name Gordon. It seems to mean "spacious fort".
This idea of a fort is one that has come up before, and which I have equated with the "Holy Places" that God's people will stand in at a future day and not be moved from. Readers who took a look at Part 1 (and the only part for now) of the Jan-Feb 2022 words would have read these words and my interpretation:
Artu ararat kin Yavanna heir
Fortress high out way/ path family Yavanna heir
(the family of Yavanna's heir will be led on a path to a high fortress by that heir)
No comments:
Post a Comment